Muddled Messages

By

First up, an apology. Iโ€™ve been absent without leave, thanks largely to starting the novel. Itโ€™s consumed almost every thought and I havenโ€™t been in a position to think about this place for a bit. This might be the case for a few weeks over the summer while I get a first draft down.
However, while Iโ€™m here, I thought Iโ€™d just mention something about books on the writing process and how they can hinder, not hurt, your own work.

Iโ€™ve read so many books on writing, and articles about the process of writing, I think theyโ€™ve all become a useless mush. Clearly, some are better than others, but I realise now I made the mistake of reading too many. For a start, they often contradict each other, or at least do enough to muddle the message.

Then there are the โ€˜rulesโ€™. Itโ€™s natural. Youโ€™re trying to find the magic formula to write your book, the one piece of advice or theory that will help structure your story. So let someone give you some rules, abide by those rules and BAM, you have a book, right?

Except, you read a book that says donโ€™t introduce new characters after the start of Act 3, and then you read Olive Kitteridge and a new character is perfectly introduced 10 pages from the end.

Or, you read a chapter on showing not telling and then you read anything by George Saunders and realise telling is as essential as showing to pace your story.

I even once read a book called โ€˜How Not To Write A Novelโ€™ – which was full of chapters of things you mustnโ€™t do when writing a book. How ridiculous it was of me to read it. It had all manner of rules, to do with backstory, flashbacks, dialogue tags, paragraph lengths etc etc and of course, itโ€™s all bollocks, because for every one of these rules, there are hundreds of successful books that take no notice of such prescriptive, limiting advice. That book was packed off the charity shop a long time ago.

There are exceptions. Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott is a wonderful book on writing, full of truisms rather than rules, including allowing yourself to write a shitty first draft. Thatโ€™s something Iโ€™ve had huge problems with. Iโ€™ve wasted so much time getting halfway through something and then allowing the inner critic to stall me, convince me itโ€™s pointless continuing. I know now, better late than never, that you have to plough through that, get it written and donโ€™t worry what itโ€™s like. You canโ€™t improve what you havenโ€™t written, after all.

Iโ€™ve also taken a lot from Larry Brooksโ€™ โ€˜Story Engineeringโ€™, which breaks down the structure for huge swathes of literature and storytelling through time. I use this as a blueprint, but in the end, it comes down to your story and your writing. If your writing is engaging, the reader will happily read it.

And so, the best advice? Itโ€™s all there, in the books you read and enjoy. Read them, enjoy them, love them. Then, if you want, read them again with a critical eye, breaking them down so you can apply some of the magic to your own work.

Anyway, just thought Iโ€™d pop my head back above the parapet and say sorry for my absence. I am beavering away and imagine Iโ€™ll be a lot more regular here at the back end of summer and heading into autumn.

Smile on x

P.S. Iโ€™m taking Kel to Berlin for four days for her birthday next week. If anyone has any advice for must-visit places/bars etc, please let me know. Canโ€™t wait.

P.P.S I got my marks back for the first year of my MA last week and am now officially halfway to a first, which is lovely. Thank you so much to those who have given feedback on things I ended up submitting. I appreciate it so much.

P.P.P.S #ToriesOut

Posted In ,

13 responses to “Muddled Messages”

  1. Wow! Huge congrats on your half-first – that’s wonderful. And you’re right, reading too many how-to-write books can be counterproductive, baffling and downright depressing.
    How the hell are you supposed to assimilate all that information and not be constrained by it? I tried to find a formula for plotting (something I think I’m quite weak on) but the 8 point plot arcs that you ‘must’ adhere to according to many just got my back up (why must a story hit all these points – don’t tell me what to do, dammit!) and I even tried plotting graphs as a visual aid, but they were just lines on a page, meaningless.
    Still, I’m glad I read the guides though. Even if I don’t plot stories out religiously, I still adhere to some of the ideas I’ve read (having an inciting incident, use of conflict – internal and external, upping the stakes at the mid point, making the main protagonist’s lowest point just before the final act). But for me, they’re just loose ideas to bear in mind rather than strict rules.
    I hope the first draft goes well – you’re right, just throw it down and sort the details later – and enjoy Berlin.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I completely agree Lynn. Using all those things, such as Inciting Incident and the ‘context shifting midpoint’ etc are really helpful to give your story structure. I too am quite weak on plot, so needed guidance on that, on how best to structure the book, but once you have that framework, it should be a liberating experience, not a series of depressing restrictions!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Very true. I appreciate the guidance, but dislike the idea I ‘must’ create a story to a defined pattern.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I think I’ve read so much ‘advice’ on writing that it has brought me to a near stand still on my novel. So many contradicting ideas about what it should and shouldn’t be… I can’t work like that. I’m trying at the moment to ignore it all and write what comes naturally, then when it comes to editing I’ll look at it again through the different lenses of advice.

    Well done on getting top marks for your MA!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m exactly the same. This time I am determined to just get to the end, then I will reshape etc. Just have to get to the end. Good luck with it ๐Ÿ™‚

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks, same to you!

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Mandie Hines

    Exciting news about your MA marks, Ben. Well done!
    I know what you mean about all the writing advice. I usually scrutinize and think about a writing book for months before I finally pick it up and read it. I’m usually drawn to specific tips and bullet points that help summarize different rules so I can find the information quickly when I’m looking something up for editing my work. In particular, I like books written by people who have been in the editing and publishing industry and know what makes it in and what gets rejected.
    One thing to consider about writing advice is that a good portion of these books are written for amateurs who are looking for some concrete advice on how to get started. The second part is that the advice that applies to unpublished writers does not necessarily apply to published authors, and the reason is that those who are published have name recognition and a fan base. They can get away with more than someone trying to break into the business. And connected to these first two is that these rules are written in a way that sounds like it’s the one right way to make the person offering the advice sound confident and reliable. It’s not to say that there aren’t other ways, but it would make the advice feel even more muddled if they said you can tell when it feels right to the story, but otherwise you should be showing. You’d end up thinking, well how do I know when it’s right to tell versus show? Or how do I know when to follow this rule and when not to? And the simple answers to those questions are through practice, observing other writers, and trial and error. But that’s not exactly simple either.
    I find that if the rules are stopping my creative process, I ignore them, at least until it’s time to edit. Each author has to find their own path and system that works the best for them. I think that’s why there are so many different books offering contradicting advice is because those authors have found a different way that works best for them. However, I think one of the biggest mistakes an amateur writer can make is thinking their writing is exempt from the established rules of the writing world.
    See, even my comment sounds more confident than I feel about the process. That comes from writing posts about the rules of writing. ๐Ÿ™‚
    I have been wondering how your novel writing is going, and what it’s about, if you feel comfortable enough to talk about that yet.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. All really good points Mandie. There are, of course, certain rules, when it comes to fiction and storytelling. Watch any Pixar film and the arc of the plot is almost exactly the same each time, because it works – it’s the way stories have been told for thousands of years. Hence Joseph Campbell’s ‘Hero With A Thousand Faces’ and Vogler’s ‘Hero’s Journey’ etc. Of course, successful books are written that break the rules, but they are done by knowing the rules in the first place. But these are largely structural rules, and I feel a lot of the advice books deal with subjective stylistic points, such as the use of flashback or chapter length etc, which can instantly put up barriers for those trying to write with freedom.

      Anyway, as far as my book is concerned, I was going to reply to you here, but I think I’ll write a blog post about it tomorrow. I haven’t really spoken to anyone about it yet, so getting it down and forcing myself to justify the story to ‘strangers’ might be helpful in proving to myself that it’s got legs (or vice versa, but hopefully not!)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Mandie Hines

        I think there are so many nuances of writing learned through experience, which means there aren’t any quick tips you can give another writer to master these areas. Flashbacks are a good example. I use them in my own writing. I love them in books, movies, TV shows, etc. However, there is a point where they are introduced too early, are too lengthy, or where they become the bulk of the story. I think editors and authors point them out as something to avoid because they’ve seen them done incorrectly so often that it’s easier to say “Don’t do it” rather than explain the subtle ways of when and how to use them successfully.
        Even following the rules, there are authors who have a format they follow for every book that gets them on the best selling list. Yet, if you read them, their stories become predictable and always have the same flow. Which sometimes you can appreciate, but often times it’s boring, especially if you’re an avid reader.
        I feel like we’re in the middle of a writing group discussion, Ben.
        What’s the message? Be authentic, do it the best you know how, and strive to learn and write better every day.
        I’m excited to read your post and hear what you’ve been working on.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. daveyone1

    Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

    Like

  5. Congratulations on your MA progress to date.
    Might I humbly suggest that people write books on how to write books cos they actually can’t write a book themselves. Does that make any sense?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Congratulations on your excellent marks, Ben. I hate the ‘rules of writing’ too – they’re there to be broken and those self-help books give us something to rage against. I hope you both enjoy Berlin – it’s on my ‘to visit’ list.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you Sara. No kids with us so I’m taking the laptop ๐Ÿ™‚

      Like

Leave a reply to Ben Cancel reply